|
Build Support for NYC
Sustainability Initiatives
Let's focus on economic benefits, as well as
climate change response
New York City is a world leader in sustainability and climate change response
efforts. Long-term investments in mass
transit, the electric grid, energy efficiency, water and energy conservation,
and renewable energy are necessary to make the City sustainable, which
includes maintaining quality of life and remaining, economically viable and competitive
with other leading world cities.
We need strong public support to fund and implement these efforts, despite
the economic downturn. Communications studies show that
framing initiatives as responses to climate change will likely get weak
public support.
To get the support we
need, the Bloomberg Administration and the City Council should expand their
strategy for promoting sustainability initiatives - from one that primarily
speaks to climate change and environmental benefits, to one that also focuses
on economic benefits.
The
world’s top climate scientists say that to avoid irreversible,
accelerating global warming we must drastically curtail our use of fossil
fuels. However, environmental interests
lack support when they are falsely perceived as counter to economic
interests. As reported by the
Pew Research Center, the top policy concerns of the American public are the
economy and jobs, with climate change at the
bottom of the list and dropping
sharply to only 28% of the American public perceiving it as a priority. Climate change is often perceived as an
abstract and uncertain threat, with impacts taking place
far in the future, or in distant places.
Many erroneously think this year’s snowy winter is evidence against
climate change.
Near term costs and
benefits are more persuasive. A Columbia University report on
climate change communications explains that people are more likely to
make the more sustainable choice when clearly shown how it will minimize
their risk of losses from near-term threats with visible local impacts. Many
sustainability initiatives can be reframed as preparation for higher energy
costs to attract broader support.
Oil price increases are likely by
2015 or before, according to a growing consensus of expert observers and
business leaders, as reported in the Wall Street Journal coverage of a UK industry task
force. Unlike the effects of climate change, impacts of higher fuel
prices will be local, near term, and immediately evident. They will include higher costs for building
heating homes and transportation - commuting, trucking goods, and operating
police, fire, school and garbage vehicles.
Higher fuel costs will also reduce discretionary spending, and increase risk of loan
defaults.
City
government, business and civic leaders should promote sustainability
initiatives in ways that will maximize their public support and
participation. These initiatives will
buffer the impacts of inadequately discussed and increasingly likely higher
fuel prices, will increase the City’s resilience in increasingly turbulent
times, and will create green jobs that can’t be outsourced. Many examples of how to contain future
costs can be found in municipal
reports from San Francisco, CA, Portland, OR and Bloomington, IN. For references, see Sierra Club
NYC's own 2008 report at www.beyondoilnyc.org. Contact beyondoilnyc@yahoo.com to
discuss how the City should address these issues.
***
Near
Term Costs and Benefits Are More Persuasive Motivations for Sustainability
Action than Climate Change
“Public's Priorities for 2010:
Economy, Jobs, Terrorism,” Jan. 25, 2010,
Pew Research Center, http://people-press.org/report/584/policy-priorities-2010
“The Psychology of Climate Change Communication,” 2009, Center for Research
on Environmental Decisions, Columbia University, http://www.cred.columbia.edu/guide/guide/principles.html
“Growing Green-Collar Jobs: Energy
Efficiency,” Urban Agenda, 2007, http://www.urbanagenda.org/ggcj_ee.htm
Apollo Alliance, http://apolloalliance.org/reports/
“Estimating the Jobs
Impact of Tackling Climate Change,” American Solar Energy Society,
2009. http://www.ases.org/pdf/ASES_TCCJobs_Summary.pdf
Higher oil costs coming in near future
Goldman Sachs has
predicted that oil shortages will reappear in 2011.
“Oil Shortages to Reappear in 2011,
Goldman Sachs Says,” Jan. 18, 2010, Bloomberg,
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601072&sid=axnm2BeGMveI
Global oil production will reach its
maximum levels within five years, states the UK Industry Task Force on Peak Oil and Energy Security, and then
go into permanent decline. Britain is
unprepared for the coming oil shortages and price spikes. "Governments need to urgently,
urgently wake up," said Richard Branson, CEO of Virgin Group, to the
BBC.
“ Oil crunch 'just five years away',” February 11, 2010, BBC,
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8508323.stm
The Wall Street Journal says peak oil is an
urgent concern.
“…But the … Industry Taskforce on Peak Oil and Energy
Security … arguments are well founded and lead it to the conclusion that,
while the global downturn may have delayed it by a couple of years, peak
oil—the point at which global production reaches its maximum—is no more than
five years away. Governments and
corporations need to use the intervening years to speed up the development of
and move toward other energy sources and increased energy efficiency
…Governments should be doing all in their power to encourage developments
that lessen oil dependency ... whatever the risk to the climate, scarce and
expensive oil would be a threat to established economies …”
“The
Next Crisis: Prepare for Peak Oil,” Wall Street Journal, Feb. 11, 2010.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704140104575057260398292350.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
“Peak oil warnings turn up in the
strangest places,” February 10, 2010, Financial Times
http://blogs.ft.com/energy-source/2010/02/10/peak-oil-warnings-turn-up-in-the-strangest-places/
Corporate leaders warn oil
demand will soon outstrip supply
Christophe de Margerie, CEO of Total: "We are running the risk of another
oil crisis when demand outstrips supply around 2014 or 2015. There won’t be enough oil and gas by the
middle of the next decade."
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601207&sid=aTv00Tc4yhSA
Jeroen van de Veer, former CEO of Shell:
"Shell estimates that after 2015 supplies of easy-to-access oil
and gas will no longer keep up with demand.”
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/economics/wef/article3248484.ece
Katsuaki Watanabe, President of Toyota:
"Our view is that oil production will peak in the near
future. We need to develop power
train(s) for alternative energy sources."
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2008/06/plug-in-hybrid/
In Honda documentary “Racing Against Time,” company spokesmen discuss their
race against time to discover new ways to power vehicles before the oil runs
out.
http://dreams.honda.com/#/video_ra
Jose Gabrielli, CEO of Petrobras, says world oil production will peak
in 2010.
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6169
Reports on how
governments can prepare
Bloomington, Indiana Peak Oil Task Force
Report, Oct. 2009,
http://bloomington.in.gov/media/media/application/pdf/6046.pdf
San Francisco Peak
Oil Task Force, March 2009,
http://www.sfenvironment.org/downloads/library/peakoil_final_report.pdf
Portland
Peak Oil Task Force, Feb. 2007,
http://www.portlandonline.com/osd/index.cfm?c=42894
US Governmental Accountability Office: “Crude
Oil: Uncertainty about Future Oil Supply Makes It Important to Develop a
Strategy for Addressing the Peak and Decline of Oil Production,” GAO-07-283, Feb. 2007, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d07283.pdf
SAIC for US Department of Energy:
“Peaking of World Oil Production: Impacts, Mitigation, & Risk
Management,” Hirsch et al., Feb. 2005, http://www.bartlett.house.gov/UploadedFiles/the_hirsch_report.pdf
UK Industry Task
Force on Peak Oil and Energy Security,
The 2010 Peak Oil Report, http://peakoiltaskforce.net/download-the-report/
“Sustainable Energy Independence for NYC,” Sierra Club NYC, April 2008, www.beyondoilnyc.org.
NYC
Councilmembers and many senior members of the Bloomberg Administration were
notified of the Sierra Club report release. Recommendations include: (1)
revising all City planning and budgeting decisions to accommodate potentially
higher energy costs; (2) creating contingency plans for price spikes; and (3)
promoting sustainability initiatives as a way of avoiding rising energy
costs.
In its reply, the
Mayor's Office of Sustainability and Long-Term Planning suggested that a task
force to prepare for energy volatility wasn't needed because
other City boards address general energy issues.
City officials are
encouraged to reexamine
this report
in light of 2008's oil price spike, and reports from city
governments of San Francisco and Portland, OR, as well as Federal and
international agency reports.
beyond
oil
|